# contributor·Active
shibo - @Seve can you please review this spec p...
mention can you please review this spec proposal for spice simulations?
Started by shiboJul 20, 202611 messages
← Back to community index
Discussion
Last active 2 months ago · plain textshibooriginal post
<@757706909351411845> can you please review this spec proposal for spice simulations?
Seve
can you open as a PR to the RFC repo, i can't leave comments here
Seve
no way for me to comment on specific lines
shibo
ok
Seve
some of it is good and some of it i'm not sure about- e.g. seems like simulationmeasurement is another way of doing a probe and could be more specific
Seve
also note with enclosure we have begun namespacing some props
Seve
so it would be possible to do
```
<analogsimulation.parametersweep>
```
and this might even be a nicer experience for users
shibo
https://github.com/tscircuit/rfc/pull/9
Seve
ok see my comments
Seve
it's the best RFC i've seen in many ways except it has far too much useless content
Seve
the enclosure RFC was hyper-focused on usage, that is the most important thing
Want to add to the conversation?
Reply in Discord so your notes stay connected to the source.