# shibo - @Seve can you please review this spec p...

Channel: #contributor
Source: https://discord.com/channels/1233487248129921135/1528878251056037978
Started: 2026-07-20T21:36:20.370000+00:00
Last activity: 2026-07-20T22:16:38.372000+00:00

## shibo — 2026-07-20T21:36:20.236000+00:00

<@757706909351411845> can you please review this spec proposal for spice simulations?
Attachment: tscircuit-analog-simulation-api-spec.md — https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1265314333764878387/1528878250498199572/tscircuit-analog-simulation-api-spec.md?ex=6a5fe654&is=6a5e94d4&hm=9fbedb5fc34b423214b4ea209e8794b13210477200cbe6dfc65c4ba726d8e701&

## Seve — 2026-07-20T21:38:03.009000+00:00

can you open as a PR to the RFC repo, i can't leave comments here

## Seve — 2026-07-20T21:38:08.361000+00:00

no way for me to comment on specific lines

## shibo — 2026-07-20T21:38:27.052000+00:00

ok

## Seve — 2026-07-20T21:38:41.903000+00:00

some of it is good and some of it i'm not sure about- e.g. seems like simulationmeasurement is another way of doing a probe and could be more specific

## Seve — 2026-07-20T21:39:26.062000+00:00

also note with enclosure we have begun namespacing some props

## Seve — 2026-07-20T21:40:18.299000+00:00

so it would be possible to do

```
<analogsimulation.parametersweep>
```

and this might even be a nicer experience for users

## shibo — 2026-07-20T21:49:02.682000+00:00

https://github.com/tscircuit/rfc/pull/9

## Seve — 2026-07-20T22:15:49.639000+00:00

ok see my comments

## Seve — 2026-07-20T22:16:24.856000+00:00

it's the best RFC i've seen in many ways except it has far too much useless content

## Seve — 2026-07-20T22:16:38.372000+00:00

the enclosure RFC was hyper-focused on usage, that is the most important thing