tscircuit community
← Back to community index
# contributor·Active

! Rushabh | Linux Shill - Why does this board r...

Why does this board require maxDecouplingTraceLength="6mm" instead of the default 1 mm? Is there a way to fix the routing by repositioning the components, or is 6 mm the safest solution without significantly changing the physical layout?

Started by ! Rushabh | Linux ShillAug 27, 20268 messages

Discussion

Last active 8 days ago · plain text
! Rushabh | Linux Shilloriginal post
Why does this board require maxDecouplingTraceLength="6mm" instead of the default 1 mm? Is there a way to fix the routing by repositioning the components, or is 6 mm the safest solution without significantly changing the physical layout?
image.pngimage.pngimage.pngimage.png
! Rushabh | Linux Shill
Removing pcbX/pcbY enables automatic placement, but the solver placed C1 near the board edge and farther from U1, so it made the situation worse.
! Rushabh | Linux Shill
<@&1420812538421051555>
! Rushabh | Linux Shill
is this a bug, our automatic placement should respect maxDecouplingTraceLength, right ?
0hmx
dose the auto router fail with 1mm ??
! Rushabh | Linux Shill
1 mm is the default and yes it fails
! Rushabh | Linux Shill
i had to explicitly add maxDecouplingTraceLength="6mm" for it to route
0hmx
any bug report will be good do you have the tsx code

Want to add to the conversation?

Reply in Discord so your notes stay connected to the source.
Continue in Discord ↗