Seve - @Rishabh IMPLICIT COPPER POURS

https://claude.ai/public/artifacts/e5ef6abf-7d47-478f-b76a-3d0d1ff3d55d

https://claude.ai/share/e04cf2c4-e63a-4773-888f-584d7544defc

<@757706909351411845> Do you see any obvious issues here?

https://implicit-copper-pour-solver-git-fix-partition-e6cb7d-tscircuit.vercel.app/

this seems good i think

https://github.com/tscircuit/core/pull/3362/changes <@757706909351411845> Take a look at the snapshot's this looks like a decent initial step, we can optimize more on merging the small pour's and all later

<@757706909351411845> https://github.com/tscircuit/core/pull/3559/

yea this is cool

Apart from that 1 isolated copper island, the other section looks improved cc <@757706909351411845>

nice

ehh

i'm not sure what was improved/changed yet i guess

are you removing isolated pours? I think it should be easy to make a "perfect" algorithm for this

if the algo isn't perfect you might want to be cautious about implementing anything incremental

is that pour there because there's a pour underneath it?

Is this the right render order? I am thinking of having a separate cleanup order after via stitching for the isolated copper pour regions ``` "PcbImplicitCopperPourRender", "PcbCopperPourRender", "PcbViaStitchRender", "PcbCopperPourCleanup", ```