← Back to community index
# contributor·Active

0hmx - @shibo i can see it running on blacksmit...

mention i can see it running on blacksmith 32vcpu ubuntu 2404 arm

Started by 0hmxJul 15, 20266 messages

Discussion

Last active 2 months ago · plain text
0hmxoriginal post
<@778624824875941908> i can see it running on blacksmith-32vcpu-ubuntu-2404-arm
shibo
according to codex The decisive A/B is PR #1642: Both runs checked out the exact same commit, 79b36e0. Both used Bun 1.3.14, @tscircuit/checks@0.0.144, identical top-level dependency versions, 32 vCPUs, and 32 benchmark workers. The fast job reports Host CPU Manufacturer: Ampere. The slow job reports Host CPU Manufacturer: ARM. P50 increased 47%, P95 increased 45%, and benchmark wall time increased roughly 46%, while completion, DRC rate, and via count stayed identical.
0hmx
i gess <@757706909351411845> because i do not see any workflow edit only the var can be changed
shibo
maybe ~~github~~ blacksmith changed their runner, I assumed it was your pr
0hmx
i think this is on blacksmith - Workflow runner configuration did not change: both jobs requested blacksmith-32vcpu-ubuntu-2404-arm. - Physical runner instance did change: Blacksmith allocated two different ephemeral machines. - GitHub reports the same runner label and runner group for both jobs, but different runner IDs. - The host metadata changed from Ampere to ARM, strongly explaining the ~46% slowdown.
0hmx
giving different machine than requested

Want to add to the conversation?

Reply in Discord so your notes stay connected to the source.
Continue in Discord ↗