Rishabh - We don't have the editor as a separat...

<@757706909351411845> I remember having a talk about separating the CodeEditor to a different repo from tscircuit.com. But I am not sure if we should have a package for users to use our CodeEditor (cause we are itself using CodeMirror, and not much added value from our side)

https://github.com/tscircuit/tscircuit-code-editor We have a code editor separated, but it needs work and needs to be integrated

Arnav was working on it

yeah, I know. It will help us to cleanup the tscircuit.com.

what work is needed to integrate it??

Not sure how much of it is implemented. Let's see what seve has to see

<@757706909351411845>

i have no idea it should probably be scrapped

i don't think there was any meaningful progress made

you can create a new repo using tscircuit/create-repo

what should the new CodeEditor package include at minimum?

i would use your best judgement haha

but ideally it is lightweight, fast, has autocomplete for typescript, type checking, and can load tscircuit's types

it doesn't need to run tscircuit code however

the actual bundle size matters

then code mirror is better.

Arnav's attempt used Monaco

https://github.com/tscircuit/create-repo/pull/1

no that's not what i mean

what is the ACTUAL bundle size

this comparison is meaningless without knowing what the ACTUAL bundle size is

Monaco otherwise seems like a much better option

also the repo name you proposed is already taken

i'm not super opinionated on this but Monaco is probably easier because CodeMirror tsx support was difficult

that isn't meaningful

because monaco isn't the right size

typescript alone is like 20mb

it's fine... i'd rather see the experiment with monaco

so just try that

tsx with codemirror was not easy to implement

it's not worth that struggle again

..