# Abse - @Seve Channel: #contributor Source: https://discord.com/channels/1233487248129921135/1541173121602682901 Started: 2026-08-23T19:51:46.259000+00:00 Last activity: 2026-09-01T13:34:10.675000+00:00 ## Abse — 2026-08-23T19:51:45.802000+00:00 <@757706909351411845> ## Abse — 2026-08-23T19:51:50.853000+00:00 The tscircuit update is blocked because its dependency-sync script mistakes Core’s internally bundled winding solver for a dependency that tscircuit must install directly. Adding the solver to the script’s exclusion list should unblock the update and allow the new Core, Eval, and autorouter versions to propagate. ## Abse — 2026-08-23T19:52:01.814000+00:00 https://github.com/tscircuit/tscircuit/actions/runs/32660838958 ## Seve — 2026-08-23T20:16:28.174000+00:00 yea it needs to be added ## Seve — 2026-08-23T20:16:38.873000+00:00 but not to core's exclusion ## Seve — 2026-08-23T20:16:51.843000+00:00 you just add it as a tscircuit dep ## Seve — 2026-08-23T20:17:02.275000+00:00 very easy/common fix ## Seve — 2026-08-23T20:17:10.353000+00:00 you just add it as a dependency to tscircuit/tscircuit ## Seve — 2026-08-23T20:17:14.266000+00:00 no propagation needed ## Abse — 2026-08-23T20:18:19.490000+00:00 Ok ## Abse — 2026-08-23T20:41:35.737000+00:00 <@757706909351411845> https://github.com/tscircuit/tscircuit/pull/4608 ## Seve — 2026-08-23T20:41:54.428000+00:00 oh you can't use github deps there ## Seve — 2026-08-23T20:49:35.667000+00:00 so then we have to bundle in core ## Seve — 2026-08-23T20:49:40.060000+00:00 or wherever ## Seve — 2026-08-23T20:49:44.759000+00:00 what you originally said ## Seve — 2026-08-23T20:49:49.604000+00:00 or we release it as a package but idk ## Seve — 2026-08-23T20:49:54.699000+00:00 it's a lot harder to release packages now ## Seve — 2026-08-23T20:50:56.699000+00:00 so maybe we just bundle with core ## Abse — 2026-08-24T06:24:35.727000+00:00 Ok ## Abse — 2026-08-24T15:17:22.012000+00:00 its already bundled we just need to ignore it https://github.com/tscircuit/tscircuit/pull/4608 ## Abse — 2026-08-24T15:17:24.378000+00:00 <@757706909351411845> ## Abse — 2026-08-29T20:06:23.749000+00:00 <@757706909351411845> https://github.com/tscircuit/schematic-trace-solver/pull/973 ## Abse — 2026-08-29T20:06:26.874000+00:00 can you check this again ## Seve — 2026-08-29T20:15:42.345000+00:00 yep ## Seve — 2026-08-29T20:16:04.877000+00:00 ah sorry ## Seve — 2026-08-29T20:16:09.693000+00:00 you really have to split this in two ## Seve — 2026-08-29T20:16:15.105000+00:00 i can't see what's fixed ## Seve — 2026-08-29T20:16:28.234000+00:00 so the first pr needs to update the repro to the right schematic snapshot ## Seve — 2026-08-29T20:16:34.898000+00:00 i literally just can't tell if it's better or worse ## Abse — 2026-08-30T13:41:43.091000+00:00 <@757706909351411845> should be clean now ## Seve — 2026-08-30T16:34:44.046000+00:00 ehhh i disagree with your solution, now that i can see it ## Seve — 2026-08-30T16:34:49.124000+00:00 where is the reference ## Seve — 2026-08-30T16:35:17.004000+00:00 i think everyone would draw this like this Attachment: CleanShot_2026-08-30_at_09.34.562x.png — https://community.tscircuit.com/media/1543660390599368816 ## Seve — 2026-08-30T16:35:34.692000+00:00 the original (below) is closer Attachment: CleanShot_2026-08-30_at_09.35.232x.png — https://community.tscircuit.com/media/1543660464733683822 ## Abse — 2026-08-30T16:38:20.338000+00:00 <@757706909351411845> Attachment: image.png — https://community.tscircuit.com/media/1543661159406637246 ## Abse — 2026-08-30T16:38:48.561000+00:00 idk ur call ## Abse — 2026-08-30T16:52:46.993000+00:00 <@757706909351411845> <@809856037376491570> can I get another review on this https://github.com/tscircuit/ti/pull/132 ## Abse — 2026-08-30T17:09:45.509000+00:00 Wdyt? ## Abse — 2026-08-30T18:28:45.922000+00:00 <@757706909351411845> wdyt should we follow the ref? ## Seve — 2026-08-30T18:29:08.503000+00:00 hhmm ## Seve — 2026-08-30T18:29:21.601000+00:00 i don't feel strongly about this case tbh ## Seve — 2026-08-30T18:29:29.159000+00:00 the net labels are annoying though ## Abse — 2026-08-30T18:30:10.535000+00:00 Should we keep the routing as it is now? ## Abse — 2026-08-30T18:30:38.429000+00:00 Wdym? ## Abse — 2026-08-30T18:30:49.637000+00:00 Like the auto generated ones? ## Seve — 2026-08-30T18:33:55.457000+00:00 the L, R etc. ## Seve — 2026-08-30T18:34:06.138000+00:00 i think we should inline or remove those ## Abse — 2026-08-30T18:34:06.761000+00:00 <@757706909351411845> should we keep making these examples or does TI they want to see other stuff , I watched the meeting still not sure ## Seve — 2026-08-30T18:34:09.648000+00:00 idk why they're showing up ## Seve — 2026-08-30T18:34:15.697000+00:00 idk ## Seve — 2026-08-30T18:34:46.687000+00:00 we need M0 and M33 boards i guess, it's hard to decide what to do exactly ## Seve — 2026-08-30T18:34:52.739000+00:00 we don't want the schematics to look bad ## Seve — 2026-08-30T18:34:57.905000+00:00 we also need AllegroX export ## Seve — 2026-08-30T18:35:44.333000+00:00 idk man very difficult choices- i do think they will care a lot about the schematic when it's actually "go time" to integrate, we still haven't gotten in front of the actual product team ## Abse — 2026-08-30T23:26:33.139000+00:00 <@757706909351411845> https://github.com/tscircuit/schematic-trace-solver/pull/973/changes#diff-60f4dfa882b09810a2721a841cdf06680ecf388b78ec594c5942130110dedffb ## Abse — 2026-08-30T23:26:53.301000+00:00 revmoed the net lables not sure if we are going to merge this or not ? ## Seve — 2026-08-30T23:27:22.206000+00:00 i don't think we should merge it- i'm actually confused what you're doing with that pr ## Seve — 2026-08-30T23:27:33.672000+00:00 it's a core issue if core is asking for the net labels to be provided ## Seve — 2026-08-30T23:27:46.561000+00:00 removing it from the test doesn't make it so that core does the net labels better ## Seve — 2026-08-30T23:28:00.561000+00:00 i don't think it's a clear win from a schematic perspective ## Abse — 2026-08-30T23:28:07.898000+00:00 Im only trying to make the routing as the ref ## Seve — 2026-08-30T23:28:12.346000+00:00 there are other solutions that would improve what we're doing but disagree with ti ## Seve — 2026-08-30T23:28:18.320000+00:00 yea i don't think the ref is perfect on that one ## Abse — 2026-08-30T23:28:21.531000+00:00 can we merge the sch like this ? ## Seve — 2026-08-30T23:28:28.169000+00:00 why would we? ## Abse — 2026-08-30T23:28:30.940000+00:00 like this ## Abse — 2026-08-30T23:28:44.926000+00:00 the current routing I mean ## Abse — 2026-08-30T23:28:50.004000+00:00 not this pr ## Seve — 2026-08-30T23:29:11.180000+00:00 yea the ti pr could be merged (is that what you're asking?) ## Abse — 2026-08-30T23:29:23.693000+00:00 One sec ## Abse — 2026-08-31T10:20:20.735000+00:00 <@757706909351411845> <@809856037376491570> https://github.com/tscircuit/ti/pull/134 ## Abse — 2026-08-31T12:52:10.387000+00:00 this too https://github.com/tscircuit/ti/pull/116 ## Abse — 2026-08-31T13:19:16.947000+00:00 https://github.com/tscircuit/ti/pull/133 ## Abse — 2026-08-31T15:51:53.864000+00:00 <@757706909351411845> https://github.com/tscircuit/tscircuit-autorouter/pull/2281 ## Abse — 2026-08-31T15:51:58.915000+00:00 can you review this ty ## Abse — 2026-08-31T15:52:21.316000+00:00 this too https://github.com/tscircuit/ti/pull/134 ## Abse — 2026-08-31T16:48:09.698000+00:00 <@757706909351411845> ## Abse — 2026-09-01T06:11:24.765000+00:00 <@757706909351411845> <@809856037376491570> https://github.com/tscircuit/core/pull/3522 ## Abse — 2026-09-01T13:31:23.651000+00:00 <@757706909351411845> <@809856037376491570> for this pr do we only want to preserve the gnd symbols ? like is it ok to replace the GND net lables with on trace label Attachment: image.png — https://community.tscircuit.com/media/1544338888519061635 Attachment: image.png — https://community.tscircuit.com/media/1544338888846479360 ## Abse — 2026-09-01T13:32:22.980000+00:00 I can see that we want to keep the generated gnd symbol but what about the normal gnd labels pointed by the red arrows ## Rishabh — 2026-09-01T13:33:17.136000+00:00 I think on trace label replaced with the netlabel is okay, but yes the GND symbol should be there ## Abse — 2026-09-01T13:34:10.675000+00:00 sg