# Seve - Can someone look into this? https://gith...

Channel: #contributor
Source: https://discord.com/channels/1233487248129921135/1519831277753204758
Started: 2026-06-25T22:26:54.171000+00:00
Last activity: 2026-06-26T21:47:33.999000+00:00

## Seve — 2026-06-25T22:26:53.716000+00:00

Can someone look into this? https://github.com/tscircuit/tscircuit.com/issues/3704

## Abse — 2026-06-25T22:31:15.536000+00:00

<@757706909351411845>

## Abse — 2026-06-25T22:31:19.356000+00:00

[attachment]
Attachment: image.png — https://community.tscircuit.com/media/1519832391508689067

## Abse — 2026-06-25T22:31:24.592000+00:00

just  remove autorouter="sequential-trace"

## Seve — 2026-06-25T22:31:47.979000+00:00

oop

## Seve — 2026-06-25T22:32:14.917000+00:00

well i guess the issue is just to throw on sequential trace autorouting for that case "Not supported in sequential trace autorouter"

## Abse — 2026-06-25T22:32:53.081000+00:00

where we can chagne this ?

## Seve — 2026-06-25T22:33:28.996000+00:00

core

## Seve — 2026-06-25T22:33:46.612000+00:00

i think if core detects any sequential trace autorouting issue it should recommend turning it off haha

## Abse — 2026-06-25T22:37:45.914000+00:00

tbh why do we still have it ?

## Seve — 2026-06-25T22:41:40.781000+00:00

just legacy support- a lot of people unfortunately use it- we could create a "deprecation_warning" circuit json thing and have it emit

## Seve — 2026-06-25T22:41:59.988000+00:00

ai seems to like it because it does make the autorouting more predictable

## Abse — 2026-06-26T19:44:20.358000+00:00

<@757706909351411845> 
```
const PassiveInSubcircuit = () => (
  <subcircuit
    name="PassiveBlock"
    pcbX={2}
    pcbY={0}
    autorouter="sequential_trace"
  >
    <resistor name="R1" resistance="10k" footprint="0805" pcbX={0} pcbY={0} />
    <trace from=".R1 > .pin2" to="net.GND" />
  </subcircuit>
)

export default () => (
  <board width="10mm" height="7mm" autorouter="sequential_trace">
    <pinheader
      name="J1"
      pinCount={1}
      footprint="pinrow1"
      pcbX={-3}
      pcbY={0}
      connections={{ pin1: "net.GND" }}
    />

    <PassiveInSubcircuit />

    <trace from=".J1 > .pin1" to=".PassiveBlock > net.GND" />

    <copperpour
      name="top_gnd_pour"
      layer="top"
      connectsTo="net.GND"
      padMargin="0.25mm"
      traceMargin="0.2mm"
    />
  </board>
)

```

## Abse — 2026-06-26T20:33:15.293000+00:00

<@757706909351411845>

## Seve — 2026-06-26T20:41:38.793000+00:00

oh why sequential trace for the autorouter

## Abse — 2026-06-26T21:42:33.400000+00:00

Oh codex haha

## Abse — 2026-06-26T21:45:25.011000+00:00

Same issue tho

## Seve — 2026-06-26T21:47:27.847000+00:00

yea it might even be better for snapshot consistency haha

## Seve — 2026-06-26T21:47:33.999000+00:00

but ya ya noted